14 Comments

  1. Beauregard

    Keep in mind that not only the National Democratic lackeys want
    to destroy Trump but so does the NRC. Grasp that neither controls him.

    And they also fear Cruz. Crews is too concerned with concepts of freedom
    won by the American Revolution.

    So, your source and the Main Stream Media will attach both with lies and
    distortions in their effort to destroy them.

    ——————- // —————-

    Trumps way: “”Don’t tell me that I can’t. Tell me how I can!”

    ——————– // ———————

    Churchill said, “Courage is rightly esteemed the
    first of human qualities… because it is the quality
    which guarantees all others.” I suspect that courage
    is strong self-discipline, controlling your natural
    fear to do what needs to be done. Robert Hall

    Reply
  2. walt

    You did not see the video link above and hear Trump admire Putin and be dismissive about Putin killing journalists !!!!!!
    There were no lies and distortions about him, in the above links !!!!!

    Reply
  3. Beauregard

    It was said, “There were no lies and distortions about him,
    in the above links !!!!!”

    When things are taken out of context or the complete flavor of interview
    or speech is not taken into account, then it is distortion. Part of the above
    was comparison of Putin with Obama. In terms of image and getting
    message out, Trump was accurate.

    I am sorry but most people are not led by sheep.

    There are ways to describe leaders and leadership.
    You might review this posting on internet:
    http://www.dentonrc.com/opinion/columns-headlines/20130606-thomas-sowell-book-offers-lesson-on-leaders.ece

    Reply
    1. walt

      Consider this,

      “The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their President.”

      Reply
      1. Roman

        I agree, but America, unlike Ukraine has a lot of mechanisms for guarding against the “tyranny of the majority”. And a lot of traditions.

        Reply
  4. walt

    There is a extremely well researched fantastic article, which ties in Roger Stone, (25 year friend and main political consultant of Trump), and Stone’s shady dealings, including in Ulraine . Other links to his mad world provided later, but first an excerpt from this article, which was written after the Kiev massacre of February 20, 2014. The article also covers Yanykovich PR consultant-influence operations in the US,

    https://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/roger-stone-pretty-reckless-is-going-straight-to-hell-part-ten/

    …. Roger Stone, who’d later try to raise a few bucks by peddling a conspiracy story involving Lyndon Johnson, which based on his unpublished memoir, Stone didn’t even believe. It was a tale with Lyndon Johnson committing eight murders out of rancid political ambition, while Stone himself had worked for Volodymyr Lytvyn, who appeared to have been involved in a plot of far more substantial basis, which started with the killing of a reporter, and then resulted in Yuriy Kravchenko committing suicide by shooting himself twice in the head, while two other members of his ministry, also believed complicit in the plot, would suffer from devastating strokes within the same year, strokes which would kill both of them.

    and this from that same article;
    …..The most apt passage for a long essay on Roger Stone comes not from any book on politics, but an examination of sociopathy, A Criminal History of Mankind by Colin Wilson, which notes that crime is often an act of domination, an expression that the perpetrator is strong and the victim is weak, that the most violent and disturbing crimes often lack a material motive or practical reason, because their sole purpose is domination. This, I think, is the prime mover of Roger Stone, whether it be the Redlich mailer, or yelling at Eliot Spitzer’s father, or making up stories about Eliot Spitzer and black socks, or labeling Hesham El-Meligy the Al-Qaeda candidate, none of which have any political purpose, but are done solely to hurt the victims. Stone’s career is forever bound to a sex scandal and there is something connected to sex in the criminal act, and this act of humiliation as well,

    and one of many article links, here, an article from early 2013 , showing the influece operations on right wing sites, Red State, Breigtbart, American thinker, etc ;
    http://www.lucorg.com/news.php/news/6436/popup/true

    Reply
    1. Roman

      Great Article, Walt. Thank you. I’m going to post it.

      The connection to Volodymyr Lytvyn is definitely troubling, though not completely damning. Ukrainian politicians were all hiring top talent from the US.

      It’s a strange article in that it tries to condemn Stone as much for association with Lytvyn as for associating with libertarian and conservative organizations which I generally agree with. Should we throw out all conservatism?

      Reply
      1. walt

        Neither Stone, nor Trump are conservatives, Stone is part of the republicans for abortion , has participated in gay parades and a sex scandel and was caught repeatedly lying. Stone used as a source in his LBJ killed JFK book a soviet influence agent.
        Does Trump belive LBJ killed JFk and that Putin is clean? Stone left Trumps campaigh because Trump needs the support of pro-life evagelicals.
        Stone too insults people like Trump. they have been an are friends for over 25 years.

        again from my above article , “…crime is often an act of domination, an expression that the perpetrator is strong and the victim is weak, that the most violent and disturbing crimes often lack a material motive or practical reason, because their sole purpose is domination.”

        The Russian state by it’s geografical size and anyone knowing it’s history, is not into western success, ( that is material motive), but like criminals into domination. They do not need a reason to attack. there motive is not to improve things it is to dominate.
        Many criminals, if they put their planning into work, instead of stealing, they would materialy profit, but that, again, is not their motive.

        Perhaps that’s why Putin and Trump get along so well, they love to dominate.
        Berlisconi gets along swell with Putin too, not to long ago vacationin with Putin in Crimea,

        Ther are no leaders in the western world. except for Poland and some eastern European countries.
        Harper was the last leader, and now Canada has a president that has skills in snow boarding and smoking pot.

        Reply
  5. Beauregard

    Walt,

    Fist, the Donald was not my first choice, however, analysis of
    the man leads me to consider him.

    He understands the media and his enemies. He has resources
    to not be beholden to them. He has been personally attacked and
    disparaged since the early 1990’s. If he were to be elected president,
    I suspect that at least he would demand competency in government.
    That vision of him scares the hell out of the bureaucracy and big
    government types.

    I can find many criticisms of him but I find him to be honest. Many of the
    criticisms come from those he avoids. An illustration is media types who
    he has given interviews with but write lies and distortions to create
    sensationalism.

    I think that the shit would hit the fan. if he won I think that is why he is running.
    He has a track record of supporting many patriotic organizations.

    Understand that he is willing to associate with about anyone he chooses.
    My analysis cannot say he marches to corruption and after an associate
    is shown to be a liar or corrupt he does not attack them, rather simply
    avoids them.

    ——————- // —————

    Reply

Leave a Reply