Author Archives: RomanInUkraine

Stomcloudsgathering is another Kremlin troll

Someone just called my attention to this ridiculous video about Odesa:

***

That video is ridiculous. Most of the police department (to the horror of Ukrainians) donned red armbands and supported the pro-Russians. They weren’t hiding the fact as this “secret footage” claims.

This was widely reported to the horror of Ukrainians. The head of the Odesa police was quickly replaced after this incident.

So the fact that police protected hooligans is not evidence of they were a false flag. It was basically a repeat of the violent crackdowns on pro-Ukraine protests in Donetsk and Kharkiv except this time (finally) the Ukrainians fought back.

Sequence of events:

– The members of football clubs “Metallist” (Kharkiv) and Chernomorec (Odesa) announce a march for the “Unity of Ukraine”, which is to take place at 15:00, starting on the Sobornaya Square, and ending near the football stadium “Chernomorec”;

– 14:30: Pro-Russian activists gather near the Alexandrovskiy Prospectus. They wear marks, helmets and have shields, and are armed with sticks, bats and axes.

– Pro-Russian activists start marching towards the Sobornaya Square, while police makes weak attempts at stopping them;

– In the meantime, pro-Ukrainian activists are gathered on the Sobornaya Square. Having been warned about armed pro-Russian activists marching in this direction, self-defense of Maidan starts pulling up towards the Square from the side of Grecheskaya Street;

– Clashes commence between the football fans and the pro-Russian activists as the latter reach the Sobornaya Square;

– The street is covered in smoke. Police forms a 50 meters wide “neutral line” in between the pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian activists;

– Both sides start pulling cobblestones out of the roads;

– Pro-Russian activists start building barricades from trash containers and other nearby materials;

– Activists from the Emergency Moto-Assistance (no political affiliation) arrive and block the entries to the Grecheskaya Street. Shops on the neighbouring streets are closing;

– First casualties appear and ambulances start arriving;

– Pro-Russian activists armed with bats and Ьolotov cocktails make an entry;

– Pro-Russian activists start throwing Molotov cocktails. Police helps the pro-Russian activists by forming a “live shield” in front of them, who then start shooting from behind the policemen;

– The police eventually withdraw.

– The Pro-Russian were eventually routed and took shelter in the building. BOTH sides were throwing anything they could find at one another. Molotov cocktails were being thrown from the building as well as at it.

– Corrupt Odesa police release all the Russian organizers of the assault. In the following days.

Here’s footage of Ukrainian protesters saving the lives of people in the burning building: http://romaninukraine.com/ukrainians-saving-russian-invaders-in-o desa/

There’s plenty of evidence Odesa was, like Donetsk and Kharkiv, a preplanned attack on a pro-Ukrainian demonstration: http://romaninukraine.com/recording-thug-organizing-trip-to-odesa -for-may-8/

When your former libertarian hero calls you a Nazi.

This essay is part of a trilogy regarding Kremlin influence over the alternative libertarian media in the west.

Part 1: Putin’s Libertarians

Part 2: When your Former libertarian Hero Calls You a Nazi

Part 3: The latest Libertarian Shillery for Russia

***

WHEN YOUR FORMER LIBERTARIAN HERO CALLS YOU A NAZI

Kremlin PropagandaINTRODUCTION

One of the biggest WTF moments of the Ukraine crisis was this demonstration by New York City’s lesbian gay trans bisexual & queer community in support of the “separatists” (who are mostly Russian-hired mercenaries, led by Russian GRU agents). The “separatists” are violently anti-gay.

At various times, Russia’s ever-changing propaganda centered on “protecting” Ukraine from European homosexuality. Sergei Aksyonov, the de facto leader of Russian-annexed Crimea has said “We do not need such people [homosexuals]. . . . Our police and self-defense forces will react immediately and in three minutes will explain to them what kind of sexual orientation they should stick to.”

So why would a LGBTQ community demonstrate on their behalf?

Continue reading

Why Belarus is Lithuania?

And the territory of modern Lithuania was then called in another way: Samogitia or Zhmud. My ancestors called themselves Litvin, and their language – Lithuanian. Contemporary Belarus and Lithuania long time have been a unified country, our people share a common history. Even the Lithuanian capital Vilnius more than 600 years has been the Belarusian capital city of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Name of the city in those days was Vilna or Vilnia. Only in 1939 the Communists gave the city and the territory around to modern Lithuania. And if you ever read about ancient Lithuanian princes Mindovg, Vytautas, Gediminas, you must know: there are Belarusian princes too.

The name “Byelorussian” appeared only in the 19th century, when the land of my country went to the Russian Empire. Then Litvin was imposed on the new name of lands: Belorussia, and the people were called Belorussians. The name “Lithuania” departed to the northern part of the land. Now the modern state Lithuania located there.

And so people have become confused in terms of historical realities. This is understandable: Belarusians and Lithuanians are the neighboring peoples. We live together, Belarusians frequent Vilyunyus, go back to university, go shopping. Lithuanians are also frequent visitors to Belarus. For many centuries we have lived together in a single state whose name was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

http://mynativebelarus.blogspot.de/2012/06/why-belarus-is-lithuania.html

The Russian Origins of the First World War (a criticism of a book promoting this theory)

Sean McMeekin. The Russian Origins of the First World War

n his third book in four years, Sean McMeekin, an assistant professor of international relations at Bilkent University (Ankara, Turkey), rekindles interest in Russia’s responsibility for unleashing the great catastrophe of 1914. Based on Russian, Turkish, French, German, Austrian, and British documentary repositories, including the Archive of Imperial Russian Foreign Policy (AVPRI) and the Russian State Military History Archive (RGVIA), the study forwards a courageous interpretation that stimulates interest in Russia’s path to war. Focusing on political designs and military events in the eastern theater, the book argues that the constellation of circumstances in July 1914 triggered Russian plans to overthrow and expel the Turks from Constantinople, extend dominion into eastern Anatolia and Persian Azerbaijan, and secure predominance in the Black Sea. While not entirely new, the thesis is told with vigor and boldness, based on fresh AVPRI findings. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Sazonov appears center stage as the astute and charming, yet shallow and deceitful mastermind behind an intricate manipulation of British and French foreign policymakers to secure Russia’s bid for world power. . . .

In evaluating the reasons that Russia opted for war, McMeekin diminishes the symbolic interest of the Bosnian Crisis of 1908. He dismisses its memory “in the minds” of Russian statesmen. He pays scant attention to Russia’s fragile domestic morale and the influence of the popular press. Yet after Russia’s ignominious bow to Austrian and German threats in 1909, Russia’s political and military elite believed that Russia could not sustain yet another humiliation on that scale.

The absence of discussion about the archduke’s assassination in a handful of diplomatic papers does not conceal the deep-seated concern for Balkan affairs. The matter in Serbia was not “some silly Balkan bagatelle” or “phantom issue” to the Russian Foreign Ministry (pp. 101, 232). If Russia remained passive in the face of the destruction of Serbia, it would be humiliated and its long-held prestige among the Slavic peoples of southeastern Europe would dwindle into insignificance. The Russian ministers feared that the domestic results of such a fiasco would be incalculable. Action entailing major sacrifices would be better than skulking away in shame. McMeekin’s inspection of the July record rests on ample speculation over a few consular reports, incomplete diaries, and self-proclaimed insights into the “actors’” minds. Absent from the war plans and consular papers employed are the enormous, astoundingly complex details behind a descent on the Turkish capital and its effect on millions of people.

An emphasis on the drama of the Russian Revolution has diminished historians’ appreciation for events directly connected to the eastern theater of the war. Building on the work of Norman Stone, the central chapters of The Russian Origins of the First World War provide a brief narrative of Russian military action in the eastern front, including the southern Caucasus, Anatolia, and Persian Azerbaijan. In the opening month of the war, Russia’s infantry-divisional advantage coupled with Austria’s botched mobilization enabled tsarist forces to score major victories in the Southwest. . . .

There is a tiny kernel of truth in McMeekin’s analysis; since Sazonov’s time, the Russian General Staff had maintained that mobilization was the equivalent of war. General mobilization was consequently a bellicose act directed at both German states. Yet time was a prized commodity and the Russian leadership had no reason to postpone the inevitable. Austria’s declaration of hostilities against Serbia indicated that war was at hand. Most Russian leaders believed the war would be short, and key figures among the military and civilian elite were acutely aware of Russia’s unpreparedness. Russia’s strategies for war were dependent on incomplete, hastily conceived plans and tense cabinet meetings chaired by all too human actors, not a cohesive strategy for the Ottoman inheritance.

https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=34716

Report: Ukrainian battalion says Russian general killed in operation in Donetsk

The Ukrainian Interior Ministry’s Dnipro-1 battalion has eliminated a Russian subversive group, a terrorist nicknamed Chechen and a Russian general, the National Defence Headquarters of Dnipropetrovsk Region has reported, the Interfax-Ukraine news agency reported at 16:09 Kyiv time.

It said that the Dnipro-1 fighters had carried out a special operation in Telmanove, a town southeast of Donetsk, in the early hours of 9 October. As a result of the operation, terrorist Andrey Borisov (Chechen) and three Russian military were killed.

“Russian general Sergey Andreychenko is among the killed,” the report reads.

http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/10/14/ukrainian-battalion-says-russian-general-killed-in-operation-in-donetsk/

***

More here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2792750/russian-general-killed-rebel-held-donetsk-ukraine-says-embarrassment-kremlin.html

Putin Libertarians and a history of Soviet media infiltration

My latest essay in the battle with Putin’s libertarians:

One of the biggest WTF moments of the Ukraine crisis was this demonstration by New York City’s lesbian gay trans bisexual & queer community in support of the “separatists” (who are mostly Russian-hired mercenaries, led Russian GRU agents). The “separatists” are violently anti-gay.

At various times, Russia’s ever-changing propaganda centered on “protecting” Ukraine from European homosexuality. Sergei Aksyonov, the de facto leader of Russian-annexed Crimea has said “We do not need such people [homosexuals]. . . . Our police and self-defense forces will react immediately and in three minutes will explain to them what kind of sexual orientation they should stick to.”

So why would a LGBTQ community demonstrate on their behalf?

more: https://dailyanarchist.com/2014/10/10/when-your-former-libertarian-hero-calls-you-a-nazi/

(comments here closed because I’d rather you commented on their website)

Russian TV Published Propaganda About MH17 That Actually Disproved The Kremlin’s Main Theory

Russian TV Published Propaganda About MH17 That Actually Disproved The Kremlin’s Main Theory

(The damage is consistent with that of a missile impact, not cannon fire of a fighter jet.)

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2014/10/11/russian-tv-inadvertently-demonstrates-mh17-wasnt-shot-down-by-aircraft-cannon-fire/

Anyone who has been following the debate over the downing of MH17 will know one point of contention is which weapon was used to down MH17. On one side you have people who say it was mostly likely a missile launched by a Buk missile launcher, and on the other people claiming it was cannon fire from a jet. Generally the former claim is used to link the separatists to the downing of MH17, while the latter is used to claim the Ukrainian government was responsible.

Russian television will today broadcast a special report, previewed on Dmitry Kiselyov‘s Вести недели (News of the Week) programme on October 5th. Dmitry Kiselyov is very well known in Russia, and was last year appointed by Vladimir Putin as head of the new official Russian government owned international news agency Rossiya Segodnya.

Presented by Arkady Mamontov, a Russian journalist who last year linked the Chelyabinsk Meteorite incident to gay activism, it promises to explore the downing of MH17 in depth, and in the preview they demonstrate the lengths they’ve gone to in their investigation by arranging to have a live fire exercise to test out cannon fire on aircraft.

First we’re shown the entry holes created by the cannon fire, several holes of a consistent size and shape.

russiat1Screenshot/Bellingcat

Next, the other side of the aircraft, where along with the larger exit holes we also have much smaller holes of various shapes and sizes.russia2Screenshot/Bellingcat

russia3Screenshot/Bellingcat

So here we have a pattern of damage established, consistently shaped and sized entry holes and the same shaped exit holes surrounded by smaller exit holes of various shapes and sizes. There’s even a comparison shot of the MH17 wreckage to demonstrate how closely the damage matches.russia4Screenshot/Bellingcat

However, there’s been many photographs of the wreckage of MH17 posted online, and some of these show clear examples of the initial damage done to MH17 when it was first hit. This panel, from above and behind the flight deck windows (discussed here at length), shows clear examples of entry holes coming from outside the aircraft.

Creative writing courses are killing western literature, claims Nobel judge

(off topic)

In an interview with French paper La Croix, Engdahl said that the “professionalisation” of the job of the writer, via grants and financial support, was having a negative effect on literature. “Even though I understand the temptation, I think it cuts writers off from society, and creates an unhealthy link with institutions,” he told La Croix. “Previously, writers would work as taxi drivers, clerks, secretaries and waiters to make a living. Samuel Beckett and many others lived like this. It was hard – but they fed themselves, from a literary perspective.”

Engdahl, who together with his fellow members of the 18-strong academy is preparing to select the winner of this year’s Nobel literature award, and announce the choice on Thursday, 9 October, said it was on “our western side that there is a problem, because when reading many writers from Asia and Africa, one finds a certain liberty again”.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/oct/07/creative-writing-killing-western-literature-nobel-judge-horace-engdahl

***

Even though the Iowa Writers’ Workshop made for two of the best years of my life, I agree with his criticism:

“[The system of academic grants] cuts writers off from society, and creates an unhealthy link with institutions.”

If you don’t have exposure to the market, you don’t have exposure to the real world. The problem is probably exacerbated by academia’s religious devotion to errant ideologies.

“Every man who does not have a trade must eventually become a rogue” ~ Baruch Spinoza

“…as a practitioner, my thinking is rooted in the belief that you cannot go from books to problems, but the reverse, from problems to books.” ~ Nassim Nicholas Taleb

” Learn a trade so that you experience the real world. Identify a problem that exists in the real world. . . . Otherwise you invent a mystical hammer and go on and endless search for the appropriate nails – which you seem to find all over the place.” ~ Curt Doolittle

How Ukrainians were Treated in US Media (Until Recently) #60 minutes

From the Ukrainian Weekly in the 80s (or maybe early 90s):

’60 Minutes’ reports on ‘Ugly Face of Freedom’ in Ukraine

Broadcast reaches 17.5 M households

JERSEY CITY, N.J. – “Ukraine barely acknowledges its part in Hitler’s Final Solution.” Western Ukraine “is on a binge of ethnic nationalism” and “is fertile ground for hatred.”

“Thousands of Ukrainians joined the SS and marched off to fight for Nazism,” and “Many of the Ukrainian men of Lvov [sic], who marched off as members of the SS never returned, killed fighting for Hitler.”

These are some of the messages conveyed on Sunday, October 23, to a worldwide audience by the CBS News television program “60 Minutes,” the top-rated TV newsmagazine in the country and a show that consistently rates in the top 10, according to Neilsen Media Research.

That particular “60 Minutes” show was rated number five among the most-watched television programs for the week of October 17-23, earning a rating of 18.4 and an audience share of 31. In layman’s terms, that translates into more than 17.5 million households, and means that 31 percent of the homes then watching TV were tuned to “60 Minutes” the evening it aired a segment called “The Ugly Face of Freedom.”

An advertisement for that evening’s program published in The New York Times highlighted the three feature stories. The text read in part: “Does freedom deter anti-Semitism? Not in the [sic] Ukraine, where it’s as strong today as it was during Hitler’s ‘final solution.’ ”

The broadcast

For those who missed the October 23 edition of “60 Minutes,” The Weekly offers the following synopsis of the report (quotations are taken from a transcript provided to The Ukrainian Weekly by CBS News).

Correspondent Morley Safer begins his report seated in the studio with a still photo featuring uniformed marchers with a blue-and-yellow Ukrainian national flag in the foreground. The title of the segment, “The Ugly Face of Freedom,” also appears on the backdrop, as does the name of the producer, Jeffrey Fager.

Next viewers see footage of the city center of Lviv, near the opera house, where, as the veteran correspondent tells his audience, “just about every day of the week the sounds of freedom can be heard. Men and women giving voice to their particular view of how the new independent Ukraine should be governed.”

“They disagree about plenty,” he continues, “but do have two things in common: their old enemy, Russian communism, and their old, old enemy, the Jews.”

“The Jews of Lvov [sic] have reason to be concerned. These are the kinds of scenes they’ve been seeing lately, Ukrainian ultra-nationalist parties, asserting themselves, now that Soviet communism is gone,” the senior correspondent says, as footage of a torchlight march by members of the Ukrainian National Assembly/Ukrainian National Self-Defense (UNA/UNSO) is shown with their leader, Oleh Vitovych, shouting “Slava natsiyi” (Glory to the nation).

Mr. Safer goes on to comment to Simon Wiesenthal, described as “the world’s number one Nazi hunter”: “I get the impression from people that the actions of the Ukrainians, if anything, were worse than the Germans.” Mr. Wiesenthal responds: “About the civilians I cannot say this. About the Ukrainian police, yes.”

Next the camera shows footage of members of the Galicia Division, past and present, including a reunion held in Lviv last summer. “Nowhere, certainly not in Germany, are the SS so openly celebrated,” Mr. Safer intones. The segment goes on to speak of atrocities allegedly committed by Ukrainians both before and after the Nazi occupation. Shown as part of the report are what CBS says are “remnants of a film the Germans made of Ukrainian brutality” and a still photo once published by Time magazine. (That photo’s authenticity was questioned, causing Time to issue a clarification that stated in part: “Despite our best efforts, we have not been able to pin down exactly what situation the photograph portrays.”)

The camera then focuses on the Janowska Road Camp, where Mr. Safer says 200,000 Jews from Lviv and environs were killed. He adds, “Nothing marks what happened here.” In fact, however, a monument erected in 1992 commemorates the victims of the Lviv ghetto and mentions the tactics used by Nazi invaders to exterminate the local Jewish population (see The Weekly, September 11).

Next comes an interview with Rabbi Yaakov Bleich, who says, “They’re saying that they want the Jews out. They want the Jews out and they want the Russians out. And they want everybody else out that’s not an ethnic Ukrainian.” It is never made clear, however, who “they” are, as no context is provided for these remarks made by the chief rabbi of Ukraine.

Later in the broadcast, Rabbi Bleich reappears, commenting on recent incidents of violence against Jews. Again, no context or detail are provided.

The CBS crew also visits the editor-in-chief of the newspaper “Za Vilnu Ukrainu” (For a Free Ukraine). Never identified by name, the editor makes disparaging remarks about Jews and notes that the Ukrainian government should be concerned first and foremost with the Ukrainians of Ukraine.

Another aspect of the segment deals with, as Mr. Safer puts it, “the heroes and symbols chosen by this new nation.” What follows is a series of scurrilous statements about Symon Petliura, commander of the army of the Ukrainian National Republic; Roman Shukhevych, commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army; and Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists.

Then the report switches to footage of peasants tilling fields and riding on horsedrawn carts. Meanwhile, Mr. Safer states: “The [sic] western Ukraine is fertile ground for hatred. Independence only underlined its backwardness. Uneducated peasants deeply superstitious in possession of this bizarre anomaly. Nuclear weapons capable of mass destruction…”

“The Ugly Face of Freedom” also features interviews, apparently heavily edited, with the primate of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church, Cardinal Myroslav Lubachivsky, and Msgr. Ivan Dacko. The former is heard to state that Ukrainians under the Germans had to do whatever the Germans wanted, while the latter attempts to explain why there may be animosity towards Jews in Ukraine.

In conclusion, Mr. Safer states: “The Church and the government of Ukraine have tried to ease people’s fears, suggesting that things are not as serious as they might appear: that Ukrainians, despite the allegations, are not genetically anti-Semitic. But to a Jew living here, or to one who only remembers the place with horror, such statements are little comfort among the flickering torches of Lvov [sic].”

A final question is posed to Mr. Wiesenthal as footage is shown of UNA/UNSO marchers as well as a group of unidentified youths (who, according to Oles Kryskiv head of the National Plast Command in Ukraine, belong to a faction that broke away from the, scouting organization): What’s your reaction to this?” His response: “They have not changed.”

***

See also:

http://www.willzuzak.ca/lp/60minart.html

http://www.willzuzak.ca/lp/60min.html

Crimea is Not Historically ‘Ours,’ Russian Historian Says in ‘Vedomosti’

Zubov, who was a professor at Moscow State Institute for International Relations (MGIMO) until he lost his position there because of his pro-Ukrainian positions, uses this article to lay out for Russian readers just how tendentious and wrong are the Kremlin’s arguments at a time when few in that country or elsewhere are willing to challenge them.

http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/10/02/crimea-is-not-historically-ours-russian-historian-says-in-vedomosti/